Re: locking rules for ->dirty_inode()

From: Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Date: Fri Sep 20 2002 - 13:21:22 EST

Next message: Marc Zyngier: "[PATCH] Missing mii.o in driver/net/Makefile"
Previous message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "2.4.19, 2.4.20pre7, problem with aic7xxx driver"
In reply to: Nikita Danilov: "Re: locking rules for ->dirty_inode()"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: locking rules for ->dirty_inode()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

You might ask the SGI guys what they do. I know that they have a
systematic approach to documenting lock ordering.

Hans

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Marc Zyngier: "[PATCH] Missing mii.o in driver/net/Makefile"
Previous message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "2.4.19, 2.4.20pre7, problem with aic7xxx driver"
In reply to: Nikita Danilov: "Re: locking rules for ->dirty_inode()"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: locking rules for ->dirty_inode()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:31 EST