Re: FW: 2.5.34: IR __FUNCTION__ breakage

From: Neil Booth (
Date: Fri Sep 20 2002 - 16:41:38 EST

Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:-

> > > Also, specifically relating to varargs macros as described above, you
> > > can certainly have a varargs macro with zero args, just look at C99
> > > varargs macros...
> >
> > I remember that it didn't work. Ok, I'll try again.
> if I remember corretly with C99 if you do like this (simple
> sample):
> #define LOG(level, format, ...) \
> log(level, format, ##__VA_ARGS__);

No, this is only valid C99 if __VA_ARGS__ is the empty list.

I posted the correct way to write this macro about a week ago that
works with all versions of GCC (and follows their documented
behaviour; this stuff *is* all documented).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST