> > nevertheless we do lock up for 32 seconds if there are 32K PIDs allocated
> > in a row and last_pid hits that range - regardless of pid_max. (Depending
> > on the cache architecture it could take significantly more.)
> What about randomizing the PID selection a bit? I.e., allocate PIDs
> consecutively as long as they are free; if you hit an already used
> PID, roll dice to find a new position where the search should be
> continued. As long as the allocated fraction of PID space is reasonably
> small, this algorithm should be very quick in average case.
Problem is it may take infinite time if you are unlucky...
-- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:36 EST