Linus Torvalds writes:
> >From what I've seen from the LTT thing, it's too heavy-weight to be good
Not true anymore.
> I suspect we'll want to have some form of event tracing eventually, but
> I'm personally pretty convinced that it needs to be a per-CPU thing, and
> the core mechanism would need to be very lightweight. It's easier to build
> up complexity on top of a lightweight interface than it is to make a
> lightweight interface out of a heavy one.
We have removed locks (code now atomically reserves space in the trace
buffer), significantly reduced the cost of taking timestamps by using the
real-time clock, and are in the process of implementing per-CPU buffers.
As per previous email, the intent is to get only the core infrastructure
into the kernel and keep trace points as patches. Some of the work going
into LTT is modeled after the tracing infrastructure in K42, which is
extremely lightweight, lock-free, and designed for multiprocessors.
The K42 MP OS Project
Advanced Operating Systems
Scalable Parallel Systems
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:36 EST