Re: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results

From: Erik Andersen (
Date: Mon Sep 23 2002 - 07:47:31 EST

On Mon Sep 23, 2002 at 08:30:21PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Yes you make a very valid point and something I've been stewing over privately
> for some time. contest runs benchmarks in a fixed order with a "priming" compile
> to try and get pagecaches etc back to some sort of baseline (I've been trying
> hard to make the results accurate and repeatable).

It would sure be nice for this sortof test if there were
some sort of a "flush-all-caches" syscall...


Erik B. Andersen   
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:38 EST