On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Peter Waechtler wrote:
> Am Montag den, 23. September 2002, um 12:05, schrieb Bill Davidsen:
> > On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Larry McVoy wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 08:55:39PM +0200, Peter Waechtler wrote:
> >>> AIX and Irix deploy M:N - I guess for a good reason: it's more
> >>> flexible and combine both approaches with easy runtime tuning if
> >>> the app happens to run on SMP (the uncommon case).
> >> No, AIX and IRIX do it that way because their processes are so bloated
> >> that it would be unthinkable to do a 1:1 model.
> > And BSD? And Solaris?
> Don't know. I don't have access to all those Unices. I could try FreeBSD.
At your convenience.
> According to http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html Sun is moving to 1:1
> and FreeBSD still believes in M:N
Sun is total news to me, "moving to" may be in Solaris 9, Sol8 seems to
still be N:M. BSD is as I thought.
> MacOSX 10.1 does not support PROCESS_SHARED locks, tried that 5 minutes
Thank you for the effort. Hum, that's a bit of a surprise, at least to me.
-- bill davidsen <firstname.lastname@example.org> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:39 EST