That's a moot point.
You'll have to ask RedHat et al why they persist in backporting
security patches to "old" releases of Apache (etc) instead of
releasing the new versions. The effect is the same, with
vulnerabilities being squashed, but the version numbers reported
suggesting otherwise.
Phil
---------------------------------------------
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerhard Mack [mailto:gmack@innerfire.net]
> Sent: 24 September 2002 14:59
> To: Denis Vlasenko
> Cc: Larry Kessler; linux-kernel mailing list
> Subject: Re: [PATCH-RFC] README 1ST - New problem logging macros
> (2.5.38)
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>
> > Regarding translation problem: it makes life easier to
> admins, i.e. you
> > enable Linux to be used by more stupid admins :-).
>
> Judging by the fact that most linux webservers were still running
> vunlerable versions of apache as of the last netcraft survey
> I'd say that
> goal has been already been hit. ;)
>
> Gerhard
>
>
> --
> Gerhard Mack
>
> gmack@innerfire.net
>
> <>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:18 EST