Re: on 2.5.38-mm2 tbench 64 smptimers shows 30% improvement

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Tue Sep 24 2002 - 12:40:08 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.5.38-mm2 dbench $N times"
Previous message: Dave Olien: "Re: DAC960 in 2.5.38, with new changes"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: on 2.5.38-mm2 tbench 64 smptimers shows 30% improvement"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: on 2.5.38-mm2 tbench 64 smptimers shows 30% improvement"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: on 2.5.38-mm2 tbench 64 smptimers shows 30% improvement"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>
> ...
> 2.5.38-mm2-smptimers:
> c01053dc 30936965 41.2616 poll_idle
> c020ee62 30635964 40.8601 .text.lock.dev <- what's this?
> c0114c08 2499541 3.33371 load_balance
> c01175db 2141278 2.85589 .text.lock.sched
> c020ce40 2141045 2.85558 dev_queue_xmit
> c013a47e 932681 1.24394 .text.lock.page_alloc

queue lock for the loopback device?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.5.38-mm2 dbench $N times"
Previous message: Dave Olien: "Re: DAC960 in 2.5.38, with new changes"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: on 2.5.38-mm2 tbench 64 smptimers shows 30% improvement"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: on 2.5.38-mm2 tbench 64 smptimers shows 30% improvement"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: on 2.5.38-mm2 tbench 64 smptimers shows 30% improvement"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:19 EST