Re: [patch 3/4] slab reclaim balancing

From: Manfred Spraul (manfred@colorfullife.com)
Date: Thu Sep 26 2002 - 10:24:31 EST


William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>
> This might need testing on large-memory 64-bit boxen for that, since
> ZONE_NORMAL pressure outweighs many other considerations on my boxen.
>

Most of them will be SMP, correct? For SMP, 95% of the memory operations
occur in the per-cpu arrays. I'm not sure if a slab is really the right
backend behind the per-cpu arrays - perhaps a algorithms that's more
aggressive toward finding freeable pages would be a better choice, even
if it needs more cpu time for sorting/searching through the partially
allocated pages.

--
	Manfred

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:27 EST