Re: bug in sys_getpid() comment?

From: Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
Date: Thu Sep 26 2002 - 22:45:10 EST


On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 23:21, Shaya Potter wrote:

> asmlinkage long sys_getpid(void)
> {
> /* This is SMP safe - current->pid doesn't change */
> return current->tgid;
> }
>
> I assume we are returning tgid so that no matter what thread of a
> multithreaded program calls getpid we return the same value, and that
> the comment with pid is old and should have been updated when it was
> changed to return tgid. A student in my Operating Systems class pointed
> this out, so I figured no harm in pointing the possible bug out.

Yes, you are correct, the comment is wrong. We switched to returning
the tgid in early 2.4 when CLONE_THREAD was introduced. The tgid and
pid are identical unless CLONE_THREAD was used.

Attached patch fixes the typo and adds some comments explaining this.
Marcelo, patch is against 2.4.20-pre8, please apply.

        Robert Love


--- linux-2.4.20-pre8/kernel/timer.c Thu Sep 26 23:37:02 2002
+++ linux/kernel/timer.c Thu Sep 26 23:39:25 2002
@@ -740,10 +740,18 @@
  * The Alpha uses getxpid, getxuid, and getxgid instead. Maybe this
  * should be moved into arch/i386 instead?
  */
-
+
+/**
+ * sys_getpid - return the thread group id of the current process
+ *
+ * Note, despite the name, this returns the tgid not the pid. The tgid and
+ * the pid are identical unless CLONE_THREAD was specified on clone() in
+ * which case the tgid is the same in all threads of the same group.
+ *
+ * This is SMP safe as current->tgid does not change.
+ */
 asmlinkage long sys_getpid(void)
 {
- /* This is SMP safe - current->pid doesn't change */
         return current->tgid;
 }
 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:30 EST