Re: v2.6 vs v3.0

From: Andi Kleen (ak@muc.de)
Date: Sun Sep 29 2002 - 10:34:40 EST


jbradford@dial.pipex.com writes:

> > The block IO cleanups are important, and that was the major thing _I_
> > personally wanted from the 2.5.x tree when it was opened. I agree with you
> > there. But I don't think they are major-number-material.
>
> I'd definitely have voted for stable IPV6 being a 3.0.x requirement, but I guess it's a bit late now :-/

Actually current IPv6 is stable and has been for a long time, it's just not
completely standards compliant (but still quite usable for a lot of people)

If you mean stable implies the latest whizbang features you have a different
meaning of stable than me.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:40 EST