Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Mon Sep 30 2002 - 12:12:54 EST

Next message: Steven Cole: "Re: 2.5.39-bk2 compile failure with CONFIG_XFS_FS=y"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "[ANNOUNCE] procps 2.0.9"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:38:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > see the workqueues patch i posted a couple of minutes ago. Does this solve
> > XFS's problems?
>
> Not exactly. All your work on one queue is internally serialize. An
> totally unserialized workqueue would be best for XFS.

you can create as many queues as you wish - one per CPU for example. Or
one per mounted fs per CPU.

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Steven Cole: "Re: 2.5.39-bk2 compile failure with CONFIG_XFS_FS=y"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "[ANNOUNCE] procps 2.0.9"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:47 EST