Re: [PATCH][2.5] Single linked lists for Linux, overly complicated v2

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@arcor.de)
Date: Mon Sep 30 2002 - 14:48:10 EST

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice driver"
Previous message: Thomas Molina: "Re: cdrecord, IDE-SCSI and 2.5.39"
In reply to: Peter Chubb: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] Single linked lists for Linux, overly complicated v2"
Next in thread: Zach Brown: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] Single linked lists for Linux, overly complicated v2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> What is the problem these lists are intended to solve?

That's what I kept asking myself when I wrote the orginal push/pop
macros. My conclusion was that there is no worthwhile expression of
these things in C. Writing those macros was just something I had
to do so I could wallow in the ugliness and stop thinking "maybe
these things should be generic".

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice driver"
Previous message: Thomas Molina: "Re: cdrecord, IDE-SCSI and 2.5.39"
In reply to: Peter Chubb: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] Single linked lists for Linux, overly complicated v2"
Next in thread: Zach Brown: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] Single linked lists for Linux, overly complicated v2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:47 EST