>IPV6_ADDRFORM is deprecated.
>I believe that it should be removed.
Shouldn't we correct it in 2.4 and drop it in 2.5 ?
If the above assumption is correct...
>1) should the level really be IPPROTO_IPV6?
>2) do other platforms use IPPROTO_IP to retrieve this
>option or said another way, is the behavior observed
>in Linux portable?
>3) should the returned value be 0 & 1 or AF_INET &
>AF_INET6?
>>Also, the Sus v3, states there is a socket option:
>>level IPPROTO_IPV6, option IPV6_V6ONLY.
>
>We, USAGI Project, have implementation for it,
>and we are about to contribute it here.
Great.
Thanks,
Steve Grubb
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:34 EST