Re: this code does not get called in dev.c so do we need it?

• Next message: Matthew Dobson: "Re: [rfc][patch] kernel/sched.c oddness?"
• Previous message: Luke-Jr: "2.5.40: Unresolved symbol in apm.o"
• In reply to: will fitzgerald: "this code does not get called in dev.c so do we need it?"
• Next in thread: will fitzgerald: "Re: this code does not get called in dev.c so do we need it?"
• Reply: will fitzgerald: "Re: this code does not get called in dev.c so do we need it?"
• Reply: nick@snowman.net: "Re: this code does not get called in dev.c so do we need it?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Fast routing, although not implemented in any in-tree drivers,
does get used by some people who have hacked up drivers to support
this.

It allows IPv4 routing to occur right at the level of the device
driver, it directly pushes an input packet to the output routine
of the destination device all without leaving the driver.

This code is used.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Matthew Dobson: "Re: [rfc][patch] kernel/sched.c oddness?"
• Previous message: Luke-Jr: "2.5.40: Unresolved symbol in apm.o"
• In reply to: will fitzgerald: "this code does not get called in dev.c so do we need it?"
• Next in thread: will fitzgerald: "Re: this code does not get called in dev.c so do we need it?"
• Reply: will fitzgerald: "Re: this code does not get called in dev.c so do we need it?"
• Reply: nick@snowman.net: "Re: this code does not get called in dev.c so do we need it?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:36 EST