Re: Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2?

From: Kevin P. Fleming (kpfleming@cox.net)
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 16:03:10 EST

Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [BK PATCH] pcibios_* removals for 2.5.40"
In reply to: Brad Chapman: "Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Brad Chapman wrote:
> I'm going to be installing RH8 soon, and would like to know if gcc 3.2
> miscompiles 2.4 kernel code (i.e. 2.4.20-pre8, for example). Are there any
> problems with the code that gcc 3.2 produces from kernel source?
>
> Brad
>

I have a system that's been running 2.4.20-preX compiled with GCC 3.2
for over a month now, no problems so far.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [BK PATCH] pcibios_* removals for 2.5.40"
In reply to: Brad Chapman: "Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:47 EST