Re: Kernel-oops

From: Andreas Bergen (andreas.bergen@online.de)
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 08:01:09 EST

Next message: Andreas Bergen: "Re: Kernel-oops"
Previous message: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Next in thread: Andreas Bergen: "Re: Kernel-oops"
Maybe reply: Andreas Bergen: "Re: Kernel-oops"
Maybe reply: Andreas Bergen: "Re: Kernel-oops"
Maybe reply: Andreas Bergen: "Re: Kernel-oops"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:15:24PM -0500, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> It's just my best guess, but I'd say there's something wrong with your
> modules.

Could you be more specific about that? What can I do? Where could be
the problem?

-- 
Andreas Bergen
E-Mail: andreas.bergen@online.de
PGP-Key on keyservers.
"Freuet euch in dem Herrn allewege, und abermals sage ich: Freuet euch!" Phi 4,4
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andreas Bergen: "Re: Kernel-oops"
Previous message: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Next in thread: Andreas Bergen: "Re: Kernel-oops"
Maybe reply: Andreas Bergen: "Re: Kernel-oops"
Maybe reply: Andreas Bergen: "Re: Kernel-oops"
Maybe reply: Andreas Bergen: "Re: Kernel-oops"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:24 EST