On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, James Bottomley wrote:
> kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de said:
> > And you do not really want to do this, you rather want CONFIG_VOYAGER
> > to define_bool CONFIG_X86_SMP y and be done without ugly hacks in the
> > Makefiles.
>
> I'm afraid voyager can't do that. CONFIG_SMP was split from CONFIG_X86_SMP
> for precisely this reason. CONFIG_X86_SMP is for generic intel SMP
> architectures (i.e. APIC based). The voyager has it's own rather wierd VIC
> based SMP architecture.
>
> However, how about the attached patch, which fixes the problem for me (I can
> only compile, not test, because my voyager system is at home and I'm away on
> business)
The patch does exactly what I would have suggested next, so I am very
happy with it ;)
--Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:27 EST