Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]

• Next message: Matthew Dobson: "Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41"
• Previous message: Alexander Viro: "[LART] inode mismanagement in hugetlb code"
• In reply to: Eli Carter: "Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]"
• Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: BK is *evil* corporate software"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> What source control should I use _now_ so that I can grow into BK over
> time? Bonus question: Why?

CVS. It's the most widely used system in the world, it has problems but you
can work around those problems, the FreeBSD guys are all in CVS and so is
Mozilla.

When the day comes that you want to move out, we can import your history
perfectly, you can't see the boundary where CVS stopped and BK started.

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Matthew Dobson: "Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41"
• Previous message: Alexander Viro: "[LART] inode mismanagement in hugetlb code"
• In reply to: Eli Carter: "Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]"
• Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: BK is *evil* corporate software"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:38 EST