On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 4) have widely-usable CVS replacement.
Subversion is a CVS replacement already.
Why aren't you using it, Pavel ?
> > It costs a lot of money to do what we are doing, we know exactly how
> > much, and a GPLed answer won't support those costs. We have to do
> > what
>
> Even if *you* stopped developping bitkeeper, there would be plenty of
> other people to develop it, into way better product.
>
> If you don't think GPLed bitkeeper can not be developed, then I do not
> know why you are trying to kill subversion.
Pavel, I know you want to kill bitkeeper. However, whining
isn't going to achieve that. Turning subversion into a better
tool than bitkeeper might...
I think Ben Collins already has a script to extract changesets
from the kernel tree using just CSSC as a tool. Why don't you
help him get those changesets imported into Subversion ?
regards,
Rik
-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:41 EST