Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))

From: Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Date: Sat Oct 12 2002 - 05:03:49 EST


Rob Landley wrote:

>I'm also looking for an "unmount --force" option that works on something
>other than NFS. Close all active filehandles (the programs using it can just
>deal with EBADF or whatever), flush the buffers to disk, and unmount. None
>of this "oh I can't do that, you have a zombie process with an open file...",
>I want "guillotine this filesystem pronto, capice?" behavior.
>
This sounds useful. It would be nice if umount prompted you rather than
refusing.

>
>Of course loopback mounts would be kind of upset about this, but to be
>honest: tough. The loopback block device gives them an I/O error, and the
>filesystem should just cope. Floppies do this all the time with dust and cat
>hair and stuff...
>
>Of course I don't yet know 1/10 as much about the VFS as I need to, but I'm
>learning. Slowly...
>
>Rob
>
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:43 EST