> > Should EVMS be included, the team will make it our top priority to resolve
> > the disputed design issues. If the ruling should be that some of our design
> > decisions must change, so be it, we will comply. Certainly some changes can
> > not be done by the 20th or 31st, however I feel the team can handle most
> > changes before 2.6 ships.
>
> Thats good to hear. Right now the debate appears to be - "users: please
> add EVMS" "hackers: oh my god no" - so you got the feature set right it
> seems
Obvious point:
* Linus can always thaw the tree after 31st just for one addition, if
something _really_ needs to be added for 2.6
John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:44 EST