On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:36:51 +0200
Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> wrote:
> my second try shows all the same result. The exact same setup as
> yesterday night and a second try results again in very low
> performance. To name it: about 11 GB of data took an incredible 13,5
> hours to write to the server over a 100 MBit FDX switch.
> This night I will try to reduce rsize/wsize from the current 8192
> down to 1024 as suggested by Jeff.
Small mistake, reads improved with 1024 but writes dropped
dramatically. The set of options that work are rsize=1024,wsize=8192
Try those and see how it works.
I'm wondering what changed although I do remember my nfs* packages
changing in Debian (Sid) recently (async, sync now having to be
specified). Hmmm.
--
Jeff Lightfoot -- jeffml@pobox.com -- http://thefoots.com/
"so impressed with all you do ... tried so hard to be like you ...
flew too high and burnt the wing ... lost my faith in everything"
-- NIN
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:52 EST