Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:36:45PM -0400, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
>
>>As of today, there is no scalable alternative to poll/select in the 2.5
>>kernel even though the topic has been discussed a number of times
>>before. The case for a scalable poll has been made often so I won't
>>get into that.
>>
>
>Have you bothered addressing the fact that async poll scales worse than
>/dev/epoll? That was the original reason for dropping it.
>
> -ben
>
Hi Ben,
I didn't address async poll's scalability vs. /dev/epoll because
/dev/epoll isn't in the kernel either. I wasn't sure whether you had a
better async poll
in the making.
Either solution (/dev/epoll or async poll) would be a considerable
improvement over what we have today.
So I guess the question would now be: whats keeping /dev/epoll from
being included in the kernel given the time left before the feature freeze ?
-- Shailabh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:56 EST