Re: [RFC] Rename _bh to _softirq

From: Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy (maxk@qualcomm.com)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2002 - 15:30:03 EST


Oliver,

> > > But primary interface should be changed IMO.
> > >
> > >I totally disagree.
> > Care to explain why ?
> >
> > >Keep _bh, it's cool.
> > But pretty much meaningless.
>
>No, now it clearly means buffer head.
Another point in favor of renaming :).

local_bh_disable() disables local _softirqs_ not "local buffer head".

Max

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:57 EST