Re: [PATCH 2/3] High-res-timers part 2 (x86 platform code) take 5.1

• Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] fixes for building kernel using Intel compiler"
• Previous message: John Myers: "Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I would like to add my vote to including George's high-res patches in
2.5... The advantages have been expounded by others, along with their few
downsides (compared to just bumping up HZ). Especially for embedded
systems, but in general also, these make sense.. I'm nearly done with an
initial mips implementation, which we'll be using in my group at Cisco.

Thanks,
Brad

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] fixes for building kernel using Intel compiler"
• Previous message: John Myers: "Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:00:45 EST