Richard, would you believe that this is essentially what is done with the
GPS satellites in the dither process and in the clock correction process
to make the drifty Rb standards as stable as ground standards?
(You'd better. I designed the beastie involved.)
{^_-} Joanne, jdow@earthlink.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
To: "Robert Love" <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: "Neil Conway" <nconway.list@ukaea.org.uk>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:38
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4: variable HZ
> On 18 Oct 2002, Robert Love wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 07:51, Neil Conway wrote:
> >
> > > I was looking at your jiffies_to_clock_t() macro, and I notice that it
> > > will screw up badly if the user chooses a HZ value that isn't a multiple
> > > of the normal value (e.g. 1000 is OK, 512 isn't).
> >
> > OK, sure, but why specify a power-of-two HZ? There is absolutely no
> > reason to, at least on x86.
> >
> > Want 512? 500 will do just as well and has the benefit of (a) being a
> > multiple of the previous HZ and (b) evenly dividing into our concept of
> > time.
> >
> > Robert Love
> >
>
> At least on ix86, HZ needs to be something that CLOCK_TICK_RATE/LATCH
> comes out fairly close. Remember, LATCH is the divisor for the PIT
> and that PIT gets CLOCK_TICK_RATE for its input. If this number isn't
> fairly 'exact' there will be much jumping of time in the sawtooth
> corrector.
>
> If you are not using ELAN, CLOCK_TICK_RATE is 1193180. If your HZ is
> 100, you have 1193180/100 = 1193.18, not too exact. if you use
> 500, you get 1193180/500 = 2386.36 which has twice as much round-off.
> If you use 1193180/512 = 2330.43, even a higher fractional part.
>
> Cheers,
> Dick Johnson
> Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
> The US military has given us many words, FUBAR, SNAFU, now ENRON.
> Yes, top management were graduates of West Point and Annapolis.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:00:46 EST