[BENCHMARK] 2.5.44 with contest

From: Con Kolivas (conman@kolivas.net)
Date: Sat Oct 19 2002 - 21:05:53 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Here are the latest contest benchmark results including 2.5.44:

noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 71.8 93 0 0 1.01
2.5.38 [3] 72.0 93 0 0 1.01
2.5.39 [2] 72.2 93 0 0 1.01
2.5.40 [1] 72.5 93 0 0 1.02
2.5.41 [1] 73.8 93 0 0 1.03
2.5.42 [2] 72.5 93 0 0 1.02
2.5.43 [2] 74.6 92 0 0 1.04
2.5.43-mm2 [2] 73.4 93 0 0 1.03
2.5.44 [3] 74.6 93 0 0 1.04

process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 106.5 59 112 43 1.49
2.5.38 [3] 89.5 74 34 28 1.25
2.5.39 [2] 91.2 73 36 28 1.28
2.5.40 [2] 82.8 80 25 23 1.16
2.5.41 [1] 91.1 73 38 30 1.28
2.5.42 [1] 98.0 69 44 33 1.37
2.5.43 [2] 99.7 71 44 31 1.40
2.5.43-mm2 [2] 105.8 71 44 31 1.48
2.5.44 [3] 90.9 76 32 26 1.27

This does appear to be significant. It does not appear to have returned to the
performance of 2.5.40 though.

ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [2] 106.5 70 1 8 1.49
2.5.38 [1] 97.2 79 1 6 1.36
2.5.39 [1] 91.8 83 1 6 1.29
2.5.40 [1] 96.9 80 1 6 1.36
2.5.41 [1] 93.3 81 1 6 1.31
2.5.42 [1] 96.7 80 1 7 1.35
2.5.43 [1] 97.6 79 1 7 1.37
2.5.43-mm2 [1] 92.3 82 1 5 1.29
2.5.44 [3] 97.7 80 1 6 1.37

xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [1] 132.4 55 2 9 1.85
2.5.38 [1] 120.5 63 2 8 1.69
2.5.39 [1] 108.3 69 1 6 1.52
2.5.40 [1] 110.7 68 1 6 1.55
2.5.41 [2] 138.8 53 2 8 1.94
2.5.42 [1] 112.7 66 1 7 1.58
2.5.43 [1] 114.9 67 1 7 1.61
2.5.43-mm2 [2] 171.0 45 2 8 2.39
2.5.44 [3] 117.0 65 1 7 1.64

io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 492.6 14 38 10 6.90
2.5.38 [1] 4000.0 1 500 1 56.02
2.5.39 [2] 423.9 18 30 11 5.94
2.5.40 [1] 315.7 25 22 10 4.42
2.5.41 [2] 607.5 13 47 12 8.51
2.5.42 [1] 849.1 9 69 12 11.89
2.5.43 [1] 578.9 13 45 12 8.11
2.5.43-mm2 [2] 301.1 26 21 11 4.22
2.5.44 [3] 873.8 9 69 12 12.24

This remains bad. IO writing is still choking the kernel.

read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [2] 134.1 54 14 5 1.88
2.5.38 [2] 100.5 76 9 5 1.41
2.5.39 [2] 101.3 74 14 6 1.42
2.5.40 [1] 101.5 73 13 5 1.42
2.5.41 [1] 101.1 75 7 4 1.42
2.5.42 [1] 102.0 75 8 5 1.43
2.5.43 [3] 117.3 64 6 3 1.64
2.5.43-mm2 [1] 105.7 73 6 4 1.48
2.5.44 [3] 110.8 68 6 3 1.55

Coming back down after the rise at 2.5.43 but not to the levels of 2.5.42-

list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [1] 89.8 77 1 20 1.26
2.5.38 [1] 99.1 71 1 20 1.39
2.5.39 [1] 101.3 70 2 24 1.42
2.5.40 [1] 97.0 72 1 21 1.36
2.5.41 [1] 93.6 75 1 18 1.31
2.5.42 [1] 97.5 71 1 20 1.37
2.5.43 [2] 93.0 76 1 18 1.30
2.5.43-mm2 [1] 98.9 72 1 23 1.39
2.5.44 [3] 99.1 71 1 21 1.39

mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 100.0 72 33 3 1.40
2.5.38 [3] 107.3 70 34 3 1.50
2.5.39 [2] 103.1 72 31 3 1.44
2.5.40 [2] 102.5 72 31 3 1.44
2.5.41 [1] 101.6 73 30 3 1.42
2.5.42 [1] 104.0 72 30 3 1.46
2.5.43 [1] 102.0 75 28 2 1.43
2.5.43-mm2 [2] 106.5 69 27 2 1.49
2.5.44 [3] 114.3 67 30 2 1.60

Slowed down here as well.

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9sg+BF6dfvkL3i1gRArDsAJ9EmLDtLYj77n3G/JvmBwMp7SOfTACdFcC3
DUlvm2cpb6euJM5mFRUhZ10=
=vbkY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:00:49 EST