Re: [PATCH] use correct wakeups in fs/pipe.c

From: Hanna Linder (hannal@us.ibm.com)
Date: Sun Oct 20 2002 - 06:28:12 EST

Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new"
Previous message: Hirokazu Takahashi: "Re: nfsd/sunrpc boot on reboot in 2.5.44"
In reply to: Manfred Spraul: "[PATCH] use correct wakeups in fs/pipe.c"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] use correct wakeups in fs/pipe.c"
Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] use correct wakeups in fs/pipe.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

--On Saturday, October 19, 2002 20:12:42 +0200 Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> wrote:

> wake_up_interruptible() and _sync() calls are reversed in pipe_read().
>
> The attached patches only calls _sync if a schedule() call follows.
>

FYI. This patch fixes a hang on pipetest.c with the --epoll option.

Thanks!

Hanna

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new"
Previous message: Hirokazu Takahashi: "Re: nfsd/sunrpc boot on reboot in 2.5.44"
In reply to: Manfred Spraul: "[PATCH] use correct wakeups in fs/pipe.c"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] use correct wakeups in fs/pipe.c"
Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] use correct wakeups in fs/pipe.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:00:51 EST