I have to agree - besides, I actually think 2.6 sounds _cooler_. It
implies a more refined, developed and enhanced version of the current
kernel (which it is!), rather than a new and untested thing. There's so
much suspicion of "dot-oh's" these days, and some of the major features
for 2.6 didn't make it in this round, so indeed, no justification for
3.0....
Cheers
Alastair .-=-.
__________________________________,' `.
\ www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk
Alastair Stevens, Systems Management Team \ 01223 330383
MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge UK `=.......................
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:00:54 EST