On Tuesday 22 October 2002 02:07, David Mosberger wrote:
> Why does the cpu_to_node_map[] exist for non-NUMA configurations? It
> seems to me that it would be better to make cpu_to_node_map a macro
> that uses an array-check for NUMA configurations and a simple test
> against phys_cpu_present_map() for non-NUMA.
Attached is a modified patch for implementing the topology stuff on ia64.
It's on top of your 2.5.39 tree including acpi_numa and the acpi_numa fix
which I've sent you separately.
I dropped the cpu_to_node_map array for the non-NUMA case. The macro
__cpu_to_node() returns 0 in this case. In the places where it is used
(e.g. in the NUMA scheduler) we either run on a valid CPU or have
cpu_online() checks before using it, therefore I also removed the
phys_cpu_present_map check when building the cpu to node map.
Hope this can be included now...
Regards,
Erich
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:00:57 EST