On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 18:48, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:32:49PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> >
> >>As was stated by Dave Jones[1], this is something that will probably should
> >>go in after the freeze. I'm afraid that having seperate patches is just
> >>unacceptable.
> >
> >
> > If you want your volume manager of choice beein included in 2.6 help to
> > get it in shape quickly. It's rather simple..
> >
>
> Like arguing with a brick wall...
I will agree. I will observe two details
1. The wall normally wins
2. Christoph is right
In the mean time it would really help if people took the EVMS/LVM2
debate down to the technical aspects not the marketing ones (at least on
this list). That means fixing the bugs, cleaning up the code, auditing
it etc.
The folks who want to have long rambling discussions rather than fix the
code or test it are encouraged to find a private brick wall, bartender
(or different list) to talk at
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:00:59 EST