On Oct 22, 2002 20:57 +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:47:39PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On Monday 21 October 2002 06:22, Guillaume Boissiere wrote:
> > > Also, are initramfs, ext2/3 resize for 2.7/3.1?
> >
> > The online resize stuff has been suffering because I've been terribly
> > busy at work. Even so, it can be merged after the 2.5 code freeze,
> > since it is internal to ext3 and does not affect any APIs.
>
> Nevertheless, it means any ext3 stability testing done post-freeze
> would be invalidated by addition of a new _feature_.
No, because if you looked at the code for the online resize (even if it
is enabled, which is separately selectable), you would see it is
equivalent to the following in ext3_ioctl() and ext3_setup_super():
if (doing online resize)
do something;
else
don't even see any difference;
The resize code does not impact any code paths in the normal operation
of the filesystem, and 99% could even be put into a separate module,
that's how detached it is from the main ext3 code.
Cheers, Andreas
-- Andreas Dilger http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:01:00 EST