RE: [BUG] e100 driver fails to initialize NIC on 2.5.44

From: Feldman, Scott (scott.feldman@intel.com)
Date: Wed Oct 23 2002 - 15:07:12 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [RFC] CONFIG_TINY"
Previous message: Steven Cole: "Re: 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared forvarious fs."
Maybe in reply to: Rob Rhoads: "[BUG] e100 driver fails to initialize NIC on 2.5.44"
Next in thread: Rob Rhoads: "RE: [BUG] e100 driver fails to initialize NIC on 2.5.44"
Reply: Rob Rhoads: "RE: [BUG] e100 driver fails to initialize NIC on 2.5.44"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rob Rhoads wrote:
> -#define E100_MAX_SCB_WAIT 100 /* Max udelays in wait_scb */
> +#define E100_MAX_SCB_WAIT 2000 /* Max udelays in wait_scb */

I'm not in favor of increasing a hardware timeout value 20x without knowing
root-cause of the failure. What is unique about your environment? I'd like
to know if there are others out there that have run into this same failure.
List?

-scott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [RFC] CONFIG_TINY"
Previous message: Steven Cole: "Re: 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared forvarious fs."
Maybe in reply to: Rob Rhoads: "[BUG] e100 driver fails to initialize NIC on 2.5.44"
Next in thread: Rob Rhoads: "RE: [BUG] e100 driver fails to initialize NIC on 2.5.44"
Reply: Rob Rhoads: "RE: [BUG] e100 driver fails to initialize NIC on 2.5.44"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:01:06 EST