Re: [RFC] CONFIG_TINY

From: Rasmus Andersen (rasmus@jaquet.dk)
Date: Wed Oct 23 2002 - 15:39:34 EST

Next message: Rob Landley: "Re: Crunch Time, in 3D! (2.5 final merge candidate list, v 1.4)"
Previous message: Rob Landley: "Re: Son of crunch time: the list v1.2."
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [RFC] CONFIG_TINY"
Next in thread: Joe Perches: "Re: [RFC] CONFIG_TINY"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:08:45PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:51:17PM +0200, Rasmus Andersen wrote:
> > o SWAP and BLOCK_DEV as modules
>
> modules won't work I guess :) but allowing to disable them is a good
> idea. Not that swap depends on the block device code, though.

The module approach was just a happy thought jotted down from an
IRC log. I guess there is a number of reasons that that won't
work.

I did not meant to imply that SWAP and block was related, just
that both (perhaph) could be made modules.

Thanks for your comments,
Rasmus

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rob Landley: "Re: Crunch Time, in 3D! (2.5 final merge candidate list, v 1.4)"
Previous message: Rob Landley: "Re: Son of crunch time: the list v1.2."
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [RFC] CONFIG_TINY"
Next in thread: Joe Perches: "Re: [RFC] CONFIG_TINY"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:01:06 EST