Re: [CFT] faster athlon/duron memory copy implementation

From: Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 12:37:34 EST


On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 13:15, Manfred Spraul wrote:

> Attached is a test app that compares several memory copy implementations.
> Could you run it and report the results to me, together with cpu,
> chipset and memory type?

Hi Manfred. Below is the average of three runs.

Dual Athlon 1600, AMD 760M chipset, 2GB of ECC DDR266.

Looks like AMD is right :)

Athlon test program $Id: fast.c,v 1.6 2000/09/23 09:05:45 arjan Exp $

copy_page() tests
copy_page function 'warm up run' took 18622 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 21086 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 21096 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 18498 cycles per page
copy_page function 'faster_copy' took 10311 cycles per page
copy_page function 'even_faster' took 10464 cycles per page
copy_page function 'no_prefetch' took 8589 cycles per page

        Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:24 EST