Re: Csum and csum copyroutines benchmark

From: Daniel Egger (degger@fhm.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 25 2002 - 09:26:10 EST


Am Fre, 2002-10-25 um 13.36 schrieb Denis Vlasenko:

On Via Ezra 667 I get this:
Csum benchmark program
buffer size: 4 Mb
Each test tried 16 times, max and min CPU cycles are reported.
Please disregard max values. They are due to system interference only.
csum tests:
                     kernel_csum - took 2739 max, 2727 min cycles per kb. sum=0x44000077
                     kernel_csum - took 2733 max, 2727 min cycles per kb. sum=0x44000077
                     kernel_csum - took 2733 max, 2727 min cycles per kb. sum=0x44000077
                  kernelpii_csum - took 2691 max, 2686 min cycles per kb. sum=0x44000077
copy tests:
                     kernel_copy - took 2044 max, 2014 min cycles per kb. sum=0x44000077
                     kernel_copy - took 2026 max, 2016 min cycles per kb. sum=0x44000077
                     kernel_copy - took 2061 max, 2016 min cycles per kb. sum=0x44000077
                  kernelpii_copy - took 1526 max, 1523 min cycles per kb. sum=0x44000077
Done

The nt* functions do not work on this CPU.

-- 
Servus,
       Daniel


- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:27 EST