Cool. That will work for me.
Thanks
Chris
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:21:28PM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 15:13, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > Should this be wrapped in a if (cpu_has_ht(c)) { } ?
> > Seems silly to be displaying HT information on non-HT CPUs.
>
> I am neutral, but is fine with me. It is just "cpu_has_ht", btw.
>
> Take two...
>
> This displays the physical processor id and number of siblings of each
> processor in /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> Robert Love
>
> .proc.c.swp |binary
> proc.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff -urN linux-2.5.44/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> --- linux-2.5.44/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c 2002-10-19 00:02:29.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c 2002-10-25 15:18:03.000000000 -0400
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> * applications want to get the raw CPUID data, they should access
> * /dev/cpu/<cpu_nr>/cpuid instead.
> */
> + extern int phys_proc_id[NR_CPUS];
> static char *x86_cap_flags[] = {
> /* Intel-defined */
> "fpu", "vme", "de", "pse", "tsc", "msr", "pae", "mce",
> @@ -74,6 +75,12 @@
> /* Cache size */
> if (c->x86_cache_size >= 0)
> seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + if (cpu_has_ht) {
> + seq_printf(m, "physical processor ID\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[n]);
> + seq_printf(m, "number of siblings\t: %d\n", smp_num_siblings);
> + }
> +#endif
>
> /* We use exception 16 if we have hardware math and we've either seen it or the CPU claims it is internal */
> fpu_exception = c->hard_math && (ignore_irq13 || cpu_has_fpu);
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:28 EST