I don't understand. HT is one implementaion of (true) SMT.
Thanks,
Jun
-----Original Message-----
From: Rik van Riel [mailto:riel@conectiva.com.br]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 5:49 PM
To: Alan Cox
Cc: Nakajima, Jun; Robert Love; 'Dave Jones'; 'akpm@digeo.com';
'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'; 'chrisl@vmware.com'; 'Martin J. Bligh'
Subject: RE: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo
On 25 Oct 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 22:50, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> > Can you please change "siblings\t" to "threads\t\t". SuSE 8.1, for
example,
> > is already doing it:
> Im just wondering what we would then use to describe a true multiple cpu
> on a die x86. Im curious what the powerpc people think since they have
> this kind of stuff - is there a generic terminology they prefer ?
Agreed. Siblings is probably best for HT stuff and threads
are probably best reserved for true SMT CPUs.
Then there's the SMP-on-a-chip, but we should probably just
call those CPUs.
regards,
Rik
-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:30 EST