Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix.

From: Alan Cox (alan@redhat.com)
Date: Sat Oct 26 2002 - 08:57:42 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: make xconfig - 2.5.44"
Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: kexec for 2.5.44 (Who do I send this to?)"
In reply to: Dave Jones: "Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix."
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix."
Reply: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Isn't this always the case on x86 ?
> /me waits to hear gory details of some IBM monster.

It isnt. The boot CPU may be any number. In addition you can strap dual
pentium boxes to arbitrate for who is boot cpu (this is used for fault
tolerance).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: make xconfig - 2.5.44"
Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: kexec for 2.5.44 (Who do I send this to?)"
In reply to: Dave Jones: "Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix."
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix."
Reply: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:31 EST