Re: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sat Oct 26 2002 - 14:48:11 EST

Next message: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [PATCH]: linux-2.5.44uc1 (MMU-less support)"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: rootfs exposure in /proc/mounts"
In reply to: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo"
Next in thread: chrisl@vmware.com: "Re: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo"
Reply: chrisl@vmware.com: "Re: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, J.A. Magallon wrote:

> Summary:

> - each package can handle several (someone said 128+ ;) ) processor cores.
> We really do not mind if they are really independent (power4) or not
> (xeon, ht)

Here is the big opinion of difference. Apparently people _do_
care, otherwise they would have never asked for HT evil twins
to be reported separately in /proc.

kind regards,

Rik

-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [PATCH]: linux-2.5.44uc1 (MMU-less support)"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: rootfs exposure in /proc/mounts"
In reply to: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo"
Next in thread: chrisl@vmware.com: "Re: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo"
Reply: chrisl@vmware.com: "Re: [PATCH] hyper-threading information in /proc/cpuinfo"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:31 EST