Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Sun Oct 27 2002 - 23:32:08 EST


> > C) How would having ALL times rounded to a second be an improvement?
>
> foo.c and foo.o would both have timestamps of 0. make considers
> the target foo.o newer in this case, so will not rebuild it.

But other stuff could break because it sees mtime > gettimeofday
(strictly make could trigger a "your clock is warping" warning)

It's a tradeoff, all has some disadvantages. The simple truncation
wins here because it's the simplest (KISS)

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:35 EST