Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll

From: Davide Libenzi (davidel@xmailserver.org)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 19:20:42 EST


On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, bert hubert wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:44:34PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>
> > :( I was hoping sys_epoll would be scalable without increasing the
> > number of system calls per event.
>
> I see only one call per event? sys_epoll_wait. Perhaps sys_epoll_ctl to
> register a new interest.

In theory you can register the fd at creation time with the full interest
set and you can leave it in there for its whole life without having to
call epoll_ctl() every switch between read/write. It's true that you could
receive false events, but by studying the frequency of those false events
on a "very high loaded" HTTP server, it resulted to be both very little
and uneffective on the server performance.

- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:40 EST