Re: Abbott and Costello meet Crunch Time -- Penultimate 2.5 merge candidate list.

From: Miles Bader (miles@lsi.nec.co.jp)
Date: Wed Oct 30 2002 - 04:38:24 EST


Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> writes:
> I'm not saying that initramfs will do
> this out of the box :) but going from initramfs to "initromfs" should
> not be a huge leap...

Do you mean by putting the `internal' format that initramfs normally
uses in RAM, in ROM, and skip the initial decompression step?

Or do you mean have it somehow avoid copying the data areas of the cpio
stream (i.e. store pointers from the tree-in-ram to the actual data
blocks in ROM).

I guess the latter sounds cleaner... it would also have the advantage
that you could have a tree with the bulk of data in ROM, but which
allowed new files to be written (which would be stored in RAM).

Hmmm...sounds very intersting...

-Miles

-- 
I'd rather be consing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:46 EST