In article <20021030.143615.10738219.davem@redhat.com> (at Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:36:15 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> says:
> - IPv6 source address selection; which will be mandated by the
> node requirement.
>
> We told you several times how this USAGI patch is not currently in an
> acceptable form and needs to be reimplemented via the routing code.
Yes, but I think
- integrate our code to your tree
then
- reimplement (re-design)
is better way to go forward.
This is because the code, which works well in O(n) as current one
does, will tell you our needs and intentions better than our
babble when you re-design it; I belive we will achieve better
design in this way.
> - several enhancements on specification conformity
> (neighbour discovery etc.)
>
> Where are these patches? I've applied everything you've submitted.
Yes, thanks.
I need to check the result of current code and
to look at diff by byte-to-byte before preparing
patches for current tree.
-- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:50 EST