Re: What's left over.

From: Lars Marowsky-Bree (lmb@suse.de)
Date: Thu Oct 31 2002 - 10:12:44 EST

Next message: caligula@cam029208.student.utwente.nl: "Re: 2.5 Problem Report Status"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
In reply to: Richard J Moore: "Re: What's left over."
Next in thread: Dr. Greg Wettstein: "Re: What's left over."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2002-10-31T14:56:27,
Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com> said:

> >> Crash Dumping (LKCD)
> >This is definitely a vendor-driven thing. I don't believe it has any
> >relevance unless vendors actively support it.

As time to repair is critical for availability (obviously) and having a good
crash dump will help reduce this, I'd also like to point out that such a
dumping framework is very important. Please, merge it.

Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>

-- 
Principal Squirrel 
SuSE Labs - Research & Development, SuSE Linux AG
  
"If anything can go wrong, it will." "Chance favors the prepared (mind)."
  -- Capt. Edward A. Murphy            -- Louis Pasteur
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: caligula@cam029208.student.utwente.nl: "Re: 2.5 Problem Report Status"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
In reply to: Richard J Moore: "Re: What's left over."
Next in thread: Dr. Greg Wettstein: "Re: What's left over."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:54 EST