After some more puzzling, it becomes clear that much more ACPI code should rely on CONFIG_PM. (Sleep.c should not be compiled in at all without CONFIG_PM) As the ACPI guys seem awake, I assume this will be fixed soon. For now: don't forget to enable CONFIG_PM (Power Management in the root of ACPI / APM configuration)
Jos
On Thursday 31 October 2002 20:45, Robert Varga wrote:
> Hi
>
> Build fails with:
>
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c: In function `acpi_system_suspend':
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c:209: warning: implicit declaration of function
> `do_suspend_lowlevel' drivers/acpi/sleep.c: In function `acpi_sleep_init':
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c:707: `sysrq_acpi_poweroff_op' undeclared (first use in
> this function) drivers/acpi/sleep.c:707: (Each undeclared identifier is
> reported only once drivers/acpi/sleep.c:707: for each function it appears
> in.)
>
> The structure declaration is protected by
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ) && defined(CONFIG_PM)
>
> on line 640.
>
> Config file attached.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:21 EST