Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 17:19:54 EST

Next message: Russell King: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Previous message: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: make clean broken in 2.5.45"
In reply to: Jon Portnoy: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Next in thread: Rando Christensen: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 12:00:50PM -0500, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> Why? I have a couple boxes that have GTK and don't have QT. A GTK-based
> configuration system would be most useful.
>
> Diversity and choice are good things.

Which is why we should strive to abstract xconfig from the kernel.

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Russell King: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Previous message: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: make clean broken in 2.5.45"
In reply to: Jon Portnoy: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Next in thread: Rando Christensen: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:27 EST