Re: Regression in 2.4.20 radeonfb.c

• Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly"
• Previous message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?"
• In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Regression in 2.4.20 radeonfb.c"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 03:48:04PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This "According to XFree86 4.2.0..." patch was never in the 2.4 tree. It
> is in the -ac tree (the latest -ac kernel is 2.4.20-pre10-ac2).
>
> It might be a good idea to add it in 2.4.21-pre to the 2.4 tree but it's
> most likely too late to get it into 2.4.20.

For what it's worth, Ani Joshi was going to add it in the next
radeonfb 2.4 version...

 - James
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly"
• Previous message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?"
• In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Regression in 2.4.20 radeonfb.c"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:29 EST