Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sun Nov 03 2002 - 20:04:23 EST

Next message: Robert Love: "Re: interrupt checks for spinlocks"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: interrupt checks for spinlocks"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Suspend *needs* to touch all drivers.

Indeed, but ...

> I do stopping at high levels already

... does swsusp really need to duplicate the functionality of
the APM / ACPI layers ?

regards,

Rik

-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Robert Love: "Re: interrupt checks for spinlocks"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: interrupt checks for spinlocks"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp: don't eat ide disks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST